The Book of Love: In search of the Kamasutra, By James McConnachie
Your support helps us to tell the story
In my reporting on women's reproductive rights, I've witnessed the critical role that independent journalism plays in protecting freedoms and informing the public.
Your support allows us to keep these vital issues in the spotlight. Without your help, we wouldn't be able to fight for truth and justice.
Every contribution ensures that we can continue to report on the stories that impact lives
Kelly Rissman
US News Reporter
It was intended to revive and commemorate an ancient tradition; it might well have been intended as a parody; above all, it was written for a particular class of layabout. What it was never meant to be was pornography.
The Kamasutra has been many things to many interests. When Richard Burton, explorer and erotologist, found it (he was not, by the way, its translator), he saw in its civilised espousal of sex as an art an antidote to the prudery of his own time. Western orientalists since have seen in it a proto-homophilia. Modern India itself does not quite seem to have made up its mind.
The nagaraka, the fop for whom the Kamasutra was intended, seems almost quaint now: teaching a mynah bird how to talk would not now strike us as the height of decadence. James McConnachie himself seems ambivalent about the book's significance. How else could it be? As he points out, "As a text, the Kamasutra is no more than the glorious ruin of an ancient pleasure palace, a site to be marvelled at but no longer occupied".
Atlantic £8.99
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments