The Almost Impossible Ally By Peter Mangold

Chains across the Channel

Kenneth O. Morgan
Thursday 04 May 2006 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Entente Cordiale with France, not the US "Special Relationship", has been Britain's most enduring alliance. During two world wars, France alone was Britain's chief ally from start to finish, with the US coming late each time. But the French connection usually meant conflict rather than cordiality. The high point came with Lloyd George and Clemenceau in 1918; three years later, Clemenceau denounced his wartime friend as an enemy of France. The monstrous egoisms of Churchill and de Gaulle made relations during the second war fraught indeed. There followed a sequence of disputes (ironically, the Suez conspiracy being one exception) from the 1969 "Soames affair" to finger-wagging confrontations between Chirac and Blair over Iraq.

A crucial relationship was that between Harold Macmillan and Charles de Gaulle, two complex, theatrical leaders with different visions of national greatness. Peter Mangold's absorbing study is admirably fair towards both primadonnas. He begins in North Africa in 1943, when Macmillan had a central role in resolving the leadership of the Free French groups.

De Gaulle faced immense problems - the suspicions of Churchill, the hostility of Roosevelt, rivalry with Giraud. His triumph and return home as national icon owed much to Macmillan's skills in handling the Americans. North Africa was almost a happy ending. It made Macmillan excessively optimistic about managing his "almost impossible" French associate. And it left de Gaulle deeply resentful of American ambitions.

The climax came after 1958, with de Gaulle as president and Macmillan as prime minister. The Suez débâcle had left Macmillan mending fences with the Americans at the expense of Europe. An unspoken gulf emerged between de Gaulle's grand design of national greatness - keeping the US at bay, preventing internal disintegration - and Macmillan's, of Britain as a bridge between the old world and new.

Row followed row: the Anglo-American invasion of Lebanon and Jordan; failed attempts to link the Common Market with the European Free Trade Area; arguments about defending West Berlin. Anglo-American diplomacy fatally alienated de Gaulle, who forged his own special relationship with the German Chancellor Adenauer.

In the Nassau conference, dominated by Macmillan's plea for America to renew the British nuclear deterrent, de Gaulle saw only a cosy Anglo-Saxon defence agreement after Macmillan had promised British nuclear aid for France's own force de frappe. De Gaulle's diplomacy during negotiations over British membership of the EEC was duplicitous. But his charge of British "allegiance to the Americans" could hardly be denied. Macmillan, who underestimated de Gaulle's anti-American obsessions, found Britain's application to join Europe humiliatingly rebuffed. Dean Acheson, accusing Britain of losing an empire and failing to find a role, danced on the ashes.

It was Britain's greatest postwar external defeat; Macmillan's historical reputation plunged. Mangold sees him as "outclassed". But how far it was a long-term French victory is debatable. De Gaulle's own departure in 1969 was as humiliating as Macmillan's. The vision of an integrated Europe dominated by France is disappearing.

But for Britain the outcome has been melancholy: damaging insistence on a non-independent deterrent, marginalisation in Europe, a strangling subordination to the Americans, with its ghastly legacy in Iraq. Macmillan and de Gaulle were visionaries, who both chose wrong options. De Gaulle famously quoted Edith Piaf, Ne Pleurez pas, Milord. His policy ended in tears - but without regrets.

Kenneth O Morgan, the biographer of Hardie and Callaghan, has completed his life of Michael Foot

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in