Thackeray, By D J Taylor
The forgotten Victorian man of letters
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Will there be national celebrations this year for William Makepeace Thackeray's bicentenary? Probably not.
It probably isn't "fanciful to suggest", as D J Taylor does, "that Thackeray is the forgotten man of the Victorian novel". This is a man who saw himself as a rival to Dickens, yet not only has Dickens overshadowed him but so have George Eliot, Anthony Trollope, the Brontës, Elizabeth Gaskell and Thomas Hardy. Taylor's enthusiasm for his subject is, nevertheless, undimmed: "He was the greatest English writer of the 19th century. And perhaps of all time."
Taylor's awareness of the task of biography is just one of the many delights of this fond, yet not overly reverent account. Thackeray's early years find a young man of means squandering the fortune his father left him. When the money ran out, he decided he needed a nice wife at home to look after him. Alas, this essentially selfish desire was frustrated after the birth of two daughters, when his young wife, Isabella, descended into madness.
Sympathy for Thackeray is mitigated by his handing of his children over to his mother, but a hard life of constant work, earning money from journalism to pay for his wife's care and for his daughters, loomed. To his credit, he responded to the challenge, producing a great many novels, although none quite matched the success of his greatest work, Vanity Fair. He died at 52 of a stroke, worn out and knowing that his best moment had passed. Has literary history made a mistake not to exalt him more? Quite possibly.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments