Selected Works: The Modern Movement and The Two Natures, by Cyril Connolly, edited by Matthew Connolly

A self-lacerating wit returns from his unquiet grave

Richard Canning
Tuesday 31 December 2002 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Cyril Connolly will be remembered somewhere for something, but not by many for much. It is a pity, for these selections are compelling, only seldom dated, and often thrillingly on-the-money – even if the presentation is questionable. Sadly, there is no space for anything from the critic's sole novel The Rock Pool (1936), though The Two Natures does feature shorter fiction, like "Told in Gath", a delicious satire on mad, mid-period Aldous Huxley.

The Modern Movement accommodates his literary judgements, starting with Enemies of Promise (1938). Considered by Auden "the best English book of criticism since the war", this rightly appears in full. But the autobiographical last section, "A Georgian Boyhood", is held over for The Two Natures, dedicated to more personal writings. This sabotage conceals the provocative connection Connolly was making between his critical sense and his cossetted, then cloistered upbringing.

Otherwise, the full text of The Unquiet Grave (1944) dominates volume two. It is relentlessly pessimistic, and often self-loathing, as Connolly waxes nostalgic about "abroad" – invariably France. In the darkest times of war, the prognosis for his Europhile internationalism must have looked bleak.

Elsewhere, Connolly writes with a rich humour. Enemies of Promise displays a comic deftness equal to Waugh's. Take this description of the confused sense of identity experienced by this upper-middle-class boy of Anglo-Irish origins: "England = Grannie, Lodgings, School, Poverty, Middle-Class. Ireland = Aunt Mab, Castles, Holidays, Riches, Upper Class. Ireland, therefore, became desirable and England sordid."

Connolly's humour is mordant, self-lacerating – and occasionally brave. At 34, he not only reported the disastrous story of his passion – as a departing Etonian of 18 – for Nigel, a pious 15-year-old; he also reproduced Nigel's poignant character assassination in reply to his advances: "Dear Connolly, I feel very honoured that you [then in pencil] consider me worthy of ink. You see, I don't think you are..."

Enemies contains sharp vignettes of Orwell, Beaton, the Sitwells, Anthony Powell and the bon viveur Brian Howard. It is customary to dismiss Connolly for squandering his talents. Connolly, though, was harsher than anyone about his frequent indulgences in the "white man's grave of journalism": reviewing books, rather than writing them. Enemies, meanwhile, holds up well. Connolly single-handedly argued for Ronald Firbank's technical skill, judging him Eliot's equal.

Elsewhere, his spoof Fleming – "Bond Strikes Camp" – strikes home, the character Goldprick anticipating Austin Powers' Goldmember by 40 years. If most of his writing proves ephemeral, what of it? It may be a reader's vanity, not a writer's, to suggest that much of what pleases us will last.

Connolly's ideas about literature might largely have been superseded: his high-minded pursuit of the universally appealing in literature does not, perhaps, resonate today. However, Connolly was right to insist that size, scale or breadth could never be proper measures of a writer's worth. To find out what were – and are – do investigate further.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in