Paperback review: Hawthorn and Child, By Keith Ridgway
The odd couple turn to crime-fighting
Your support helps us to tell the story
This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.
The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.
Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.
Hawthorn and Child are not father and son, but two police detectives. Child is cool, good-looking, black, married, the sensible, no-bullshit member of the duo; Hawthorn is neurotic, gay, and prey to bad dreams and fits of weeping.
The dialogue between the two men – set out with cool continental dashes, not fuddy-duddy old speech marks – is laconic, sardonic, sweary, and often very funny. Together they drive through London’s mean streets trying to solve mysterious crimes, which never get solved. A man is shot by a gunman firing from a vintage car, which no one else sees. A police informer is invited to a barbecue. A publisher, who may or not may be a psychopathic killer, is sent a strange manuscript about a gang of wolves who live in London. A religious nutter breaks into a house and holds a baby hostage. An innocent man (or is he?) is sent anonymous emails accusing him of being a paedophile ...
The blurb and reviews on the back suggest that this is a novel; but it isn’t. It’s a collection of short stories, each of which could successfully stand alone, and although there are some connections and continuities between them (like the gangster Mishazzo, who flits through these stories like a shadow) they are elusive, ambiguous, inconclusive. Some stories don’t even centre on Hawthorn and Child, but are told from the viewpoint of marginal characters who observe the detectives from afar. It’s tough, literary, violent, poetic, hardboiled, noirish, arty – like a fusion of Dashiell Hammett and Paul Auster. Certainly the oddest detective fiction I’ve read this year.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments