Oxford Dictionary of Film Studies By Annette Kuhn & Guy Westwell

 

Christopher Hirst
Friday 29 June 2012 09:34 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Impressive for range and readability, this guide is mercifully weighted more towards movie business (Indiewood, exploitation films) and mechanics (long take, 180-degree rule) rather than the snooze-inducing terrain of semiotics.

Under "shooting ratio", we learn that Elaine May's Ishtar wasted 140 feet of film for every one used in the film, while "product placement" reveals that Marlboro paid $42,000 for 22 appearances of its fags in Superman II. An unusually absorbing reference work for students and film buffs alike. Cinema from Scotland to Senegal is well covered.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in