Mortality, by Christopher Hitchens

The year of 'living dyingly'

Lucy Popescu
Saturday 15 September 2012 13:13 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Christopher Hitchens, who died last December, became best known for his fierce polemics against religion. In his final collection of essays, cancer of the oesophagus is the enemy: "the blind, emotionless alien" that ravaged his body, robbed him of speech and affected his ability to write.

Hitchens acknowledged that his alcoholism and heavy smoking probably contributed to his illness: "I have been 'in denial' for some time, knowingly burning the candle at both ends … taunting the Reaper into taking a free scythe in my direction." He does not rail at his condition or curse his bad luck, but instead finds himself "oppressed by the gnawing sense of waste." He wistfully describes entering "the land of malady" where "the humor is a touch feeble and repetitive, there seems to be almost no talk of sex and the cuisine is the worst of any destination I have ever visited." For such a hedonist, the "banality of cancer" must have been hard to endure.

Although these final pieces are characteristically self-centred (there is scant mention of the wife and children he left behind) Hitchens is never self-pitying. He records with mild amusement the bilious remarks of one of "the faithful" who sees his condition as divine retribution for his blasphemy. He also finds humour in the response of well-wishers: the CDs sent to him, he remarks wryly, were often by Leonard Cohen. He reproduces in full the conversation he had with a female fan who had witnessed the agonising death of a friend and so, she assures him, knows "exactly" what he is going through.

When the cancer attacks his voice and he becomes "like a silly cat that had abruptly lost its meow", his stoicism finally begins to waver. He describes the deprivation as "the amputation of part of the personality". It is the cruellest of blows for a man whose voice and debating skills were legendary and it leaves him longing for a remission, for "the freedom of speech" to return.

Writing was Hitchens's great consolation and, as to be expected, this account of his final year of "living dyingly" is searingly honest. As death came inexorably closer and his body filled with pain, he became fearful about his diminishing powers of reflection. Finally, an "arduous awareness" replaced his customary fire and sharp wit. He longed only for relief, and all he could do was "wait for the next fix".

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in