IoS paperback review: A Short History of England, By Simon Jenkins
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A good old traditional kings-and-queens canter through English history, from the withdrawal of the Romans in 410, to the election of the coalition in 2010.
Certain themes run throughout: the clash between Saxon freedoms and Norman autocracy, the extent to which rulers govern by consent, the tug-of-war between localism and centralism. Mostly though, it's a parade of brief portraits and even briefer judgements: John of Gaunt: devoid of political skill; Henry VIII: great revolutionary; James I: lacking in self-discipline; Harold Wilson: determined moderniser. There are pros and cons to this approach: it's fun to have the whole of English history condensed into a book which fits in your pocket, and it really is a great yarn. But, inevitably, the focus is on Great Men, and the lives of the people don't get much of a look-in.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments