How to Talk About Books You Haven't Read, By Pierre Bayardtrs Jeffrey Mehlman
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A jeu d'esprit stretched out to 185 pages, HtTABYHR maintains, by use of dodgy logic and playful perversity, that talking about books you haven't read is not only a necessity but a creative activity to be proud of. It's full of paradoxes ("Reading is first and foremost non-reading"), and it's part of the joke that Pierre Bayard is obviously extremely well-read, a professor of literature who quotes Proust, Musil, Shakespeare, Valéry, Graham Greene, etc. He has a system of categorising books: SB (skim-read book), FB (forgotten book), HB (heard-of book) and UB (unknown book). A plus sign or double-plus sign indicate positive and extremely positive opinions, a minus or double-minus sign the opposites.
This is the sort of witty, provocative intellectualism that the French are so fond of, and if you're fond of it too then you'll love this. Personally, in my boring British empirical, way I maintain that you can only know (and enjoy) books by reading them. Bayard's point that when you're reading one book you're neglecting all the others is true but banal. Overall verdict: SB -. The fact that my opinion of Bayard's book is based on a skim-reading, however, suggests there must at least be something to his theory.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments