Finnegans Wake By James Joyce
No one said it would be easy ...
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.James Joyce spent 17 years writing Finnegans Wake and reputedly said he expected people to spend 17 years reading it. I used to think, having read no further than the first page, that life was too short to even try; but this edition by Robbert-Jan Henkes, Erik Bindervoet and Finn Fordham, a model of what scholarly editing should be, made me rethink.
Written in Joyce's invented language, a descendant of English with bits of Latin, French and Irish, packed with neologisms, distortions, phonetic spellings, portmanteau words, page-long sentences, alliteration, onomatopaiea and sheer nonsense, some of it sounds like a too-clever cryptic crossword clue: "White monothoid? Red theatrocrat? And all the pinkprophets cohalething? Very much so!" Catholics are "pathoricks", Christians are "tristians", "ex nihilo" is "ex nickylo" and "be damned to her" is "be dom ter".
The story, or stories, are hard to make out: Finnegan is a builder who seems to be dead, a character called Humphrey Chimpden Earwicker is accused of indecency in a public park, his wife writes a letter which may prove his innocence, there's an innkeeper who may be Earwicker or someone called Porter, and there's lots of stuff about rivers and mountains and drinking.
The editors have provided a lucid introduction and a chapter-by-chapter outline which gives one at least a vague hold on what's going on, but it's not overburdened with notes, which frees one to stop worrying and just enjoy the surrealism and exuberance of Joyce's language. It's still not an easy read, but hugely enjoyable in small doses – and after all, what's the hurry?
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments