Book review: Gwynne’s Latin By N M Gwynne

 

Daniel Hahn
Friday 18 April 2014 09:48 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

If Mr Gwynne is to be believed, you really ought to cancel your weekend plans and concentrate on learning Latin instead. It’s not just that Latin is a brilliant subject per se (ah, see what I did there?), but through its study you’ll also develop other skills – problem-solving, strengthening your English, generally improving your character, et cetera. In fact, he believes a Classics-based education to be “many thousands of times better [sic!] than any education offered today”. The force of his conviction is hard to resist.

This little book makes a great case for learning Latin, not least because of the countless Latin words and phrases in our daily English. But it also argues for Latin to be taught in a particular way: i.e. (that is) the way it was taught before the 1960s came along and did bad things to education. Recent techniques, says Gwynne, are almost worse than not teaching it at all. But nil desperandum! He and his proudly old-school methods are here to help. This particular pedagogical … er … modus operandi (aha!) involves grappling with principles of grammar ab initio (a fundamental understanding of grammar being, you see, a sine qua non of any serious study); it involves memorising declensions, repeating them ad infinitum (or ad nauseam, whichever comes soonest); and of course, it involves parsing sentences. Gwynne regrets that few people nowadays will even know what to “parse” a sentence means.

Having made the case – and it’s a convincing one – that Latin ought to be learned, Gwynne settles down and teaches it to you. Hereafter, his book operates as a classic-style primer (naturally from primus, “first”). Page 94, randomly chosen, introduces “Verbs, Deponent and semi-deponent” and “Nouns, Fourth and Fifth Declensions”. It’s rigorous and systematic. It’s dense with information. It is, in short, hard work. But nb: this is not in any sense intended as a criticism, for learning Latin, as Gwynne readily admits, should be hard work if you’re doing it properly. The pay-off is that if you’ve done as you were told, you should be able to translate fairly complex text from Latin to English and vice versa, and, in addition, you’ll be a person of improved character all-round. But – caveat lector! – it takes some hard grind getting there, and demands absolute commitment. Part manifesto, part fully realised curriculum (noun, 2nd decl, neuter), Gwynne’s Latin is not, in truth, a book for everyone. More’s the pity, perhaps. (QED)

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in