Art as an Investment? A Survey of Comparative Assets, by Melanie Gerlis - book review: What's wrong with this picture? A great deal

 

Michael Glover
Monday 13 January 2014 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Should we be putting our money into art? Melanie Gerlis, who works for The Art Newspaper, urges caution in this new book. Why? Because the world of art buying and selling is much trickier, and more slippery and open to abuse, than it seems to the innocent outsider. Who is to say what a contemporary painting, perhaps the work of a single furious night, is really worth?

It has no intrinsic value. Only those who have the power – vested in him or her by the artist, who is so flattered to be singled out for attention – get to put an arbitrary price on it. And who would that arbiter be? The dealer who stands to gain from selling it.

In the aftermath of the financial crisis of 2008, art dealers were urging those with assets to defend to look towards art's steadiness and dependability as a safe haven. This is not exactly so. As this book so well describes, the world of art dealing is a wild and relatively under-regulated one, with much information held tightly to the chests of a few very powerful people. The dealer Larry Gagosian, for example.

There is nothing illegal about much of this, but there is much that is highly questionable, and much that would simply not be acceptable in the other kinds of buying and selling described in some detail in this book – private and public equities, and dealings on the world's stock markets, for example, which are hedged about with regulation.

Not so the Wild West Show of art dealing. There is a genuine lack of information at all levels of the process, and seldom any legal compulsion to reveal what ought to be revealed if there is to be honest, transparent dealing between seller and purchaser.

One of the difficulties is that the world of art dealing has changed little in 200 years. Fifty per cent of all art sales go through the auction houses, and the way that sales proceed is as emotional and histrionic as it has ever been. And much about selling at auction is also hidden from view – or, at best, partially concealed. No one need know who is putting in a bid for a particular work. No one need know whether a bidder is not really an enthusiastic collector but the artist's own dealer, who stands to gain hugely.

There exists some intangible spiritual allure at the core of art's mystery, but when that allure gets mixed up with issues of big money, everything can become very messy, opaque and ruthlessly materialistic indeed.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in