Three million books were judged by their covers - this is what happened
New game Judgey let's you see just how much a cover influences your choice of book
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.We've all been told many times not to judge a book by its cover but of course, we all do it, and we're all suckers for a particularly striking, cool, or plain pretty sleeve. But do we all like the same artwork on our books, and do covers really put us off reading something?
Friends Dean Casalena and Nate Gagnon were curious to see what happened when readers literally judged books by their covers, so they set up web game Judgey to find out.
Those playing are shown ten book covers in a row and asked to rate each one out of five stars. If you want to you can get very specific about this and give ratings with decimal points e.g. 3.6 stars.
Once you click 'Judge', your rating is shown beneath the Goodreads rating awarded to the book by people who have actually read it, allowing you to see whether the contents live up to, exceed or disappoint your expectations.
Lastly, you are rated on your accuracy and how 'judgey' you are. In my case, I was branded 'the judgeyest' and told: "Absolutely nothing impresses you. If Michelangelo himself painted these covers you'd still say 'meh'. Thumbs down." Ouch.
The technical one, Dean, has shared some "pretty graphs" of the results based on the most recent 700,000 plus of the first week's three million judgements.
Of course, this isn't a strictly scientific study as the results do not account for how famous and therefore influential a book is.
Take Harper Lee's To Kill a Mockingbird did very well with this distinctly average cover, for example.
Goodreads also does not allow ratings under 1 star, so if you gave the cover of worst-rated book Justin Bieber: His World 0.1 of a star, you have no chance of being accurate.
Nevertheless, some patterns emerged, notably that where the graph is bunched together there was a consensus on the cover's quality, and where it is spread out there were more mixed opinions.
Most books received a worse cover judgement than a Goodreads rating which proves that perhaps, we really shouldn't judge a book by its cover after all.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments