Scientists behind ‘sci-fi makes you stupid’ study refute original research
It turns out only bad science fiction decreases your intelligence, according to a new paper
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Scientists behind a 2017 study that found reading science fiction “makes you stupid” have conducted follow-up research and discovered that in actual fact, it is only bad sci-fi that worsens people's ability to read.
Washington and Lee University professors Chris Gavaler and Dan Johnson published a paper two years ago, in which they concluded that when readers were given a sci-fi story featuring aliens and androids on spaceships, “the science fiction setting triggered poorer overall reading”.
In the new research seen by The Guardian, 204 participants were given one of two stories to read, which were identical apart from one word.
The “literary” version begins: “My daughter is standing behind the bar, polishing a wine glass against a white cloth.” The science-fiction variant begins: “My robot is standing behind the bar, polishing a wine glass against a white cloth.”
In a “significant departure” from their previous study, Gavaler and Johnson found that readers of both texts scored the same in comprehension, “both accumulatively and when divided into the comprehension subcategories of mind, world, and plot”.
Gavaler said: “It turns out our first study didn’t reveal much about sci-fi generally but about what we would now have to call ‘non-literary sci-fi’.
"The text we used for our new study is instead ‘literary sci-fi’, and it didn’t trigger poor reading at all. Not even when it was introduced with a paragraph describing the story as non-literary.
“Readers basically ignored that intro and engaged actively with the text itself anyway.”
The paper, titled The Literary Genre Effect, will be published later this year in the journal Scientific Study of Literature.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments