Philip Pullman suggests Roald Dahl books should go ‘out of print’ amid edits controversy
Dahl’s children’s books are being rewritten to remove language deemed offensive by Puffin
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Philip Pullman has said publishers should let Road Dahl’s books go “out of print” rather than attempt to edit his work to make it less controversial.
The His Dark Materials author, 76, made the remark during a discussion about Dahl on BBC Radio 4 on Monday (20 February).
Last week, an investigation by The Telegraph found that Dahl’s children’s books are being rewritten to remove language considered offensive by Puffin.
The word “fat” , for example, has been removed from every book. Augustus Gloop in Charlie and the Chocolate Factory is instead described as “enormous”.
Puffin said the move has been made to ensure that they “can continue to be enjoyed by all today”.
Similarly, the Oompa-Loompas are described as “small people” with the descriptors such as “tiny” and “titchy” no longer appearing in the text.
The news was the subject of discussion on Radio 4 on Monday (20 February).
Host Justin Webb asked Pullman what altering “words like this” does “to the literature aspect” of the books.
Pullman replied: “It doesn’t do anything very much. If it does offend us, let him go out of print.
“That’s what I’d say. Read Phil Earle, SF Said, Frances Hardinge, Michael Morpurgo, Malorie Blackman. Read Mini Grey, Helen Cooper, Jaqueline Wilson, Beverley Naidoo.
“Read all these wonderful authors who are writing today who don’t get as much of a look-in because of the massive commercial gravity of people like Roald Dahl.”
Webb asked Pullman whether the books should still exist “in their original form” and be “allowed to fade away in people’s reading habits because they no longer reflect the modern world”.
“They’re not going to vanish because they’re still going to be around for years and years,” said Pullman. “They should be allowed to fade away. Let him go out of print.”
Fellow guest, journalist Anna Leszkiewicz, said that it was not a coincidence that these changes are happening around the time that Netflix have purchased the rights to the Roald Dahl story company.
“There’s clearly a desire to sort of sanctify and whiteash his legacy,” said Leszkiewicz.
Webb questioned Pullman again on whether there was “literary damage” done when a text is “bowdlerised in this way, and reduced in this way and made less spiky in this way”.
“Well, if a book is a great book like Oliver Twist, for example. But we’re not talking about that are we?” said Pullman.
“We’re talking about popular children’s fiction. Dahl’s books aren’t classics in that sense. As I say, let them fade away. Read better writers.”
The decision to edit Dahl’s book has been called “absurd” by Salman Rushdie.
“Roald Dahl was no angel but this is absurd censorship,” wrote the author. “Puffin Books and the Dahl estate should be ashamed.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments