Booker Prize archives reveals award was once decided by a coin flip
The Prize Foundation released a series of archival interviews with key figures from the award's 49-year history
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Booker prize may be regarded as the primary English-language literary fiction award, but never-before-seen letters have revealed that the award was once decided by a coin toss.
The revelation, made by the prize's former administrator Martyn Goff, was discovered after the Booker Prize Foundation released a series of archival interviews with key figures from the award's 49-year history.
The Times reports that the lucky winner was David Storey novel Saville which won the prize in 1986. It went to a coin toss after two of the three judges, Walter Allen and Francis King, went for different novels.
A letter written by Rebecca West - a judge on the prize's first awards in 1969 - was also released. In it, she shares her candid views on works from the day's leading authors including Melvyn Bragg, John le Carré and Wendy Owen whom she described as a “halfwit.”
West disregarded nominated works, including Bragg's Without a City Wall, as “grossly overwritten” and “curiously disappointing”. The eventual winner, PH Newby's Something to Answer For also failed to avoid her critique with West stating she “could not make out what it is about.”
This year's Man Booker prize winner will be announced on 16 October.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments