Spymistress not spooked when given third degree by audience

Katy Guest
Tuesday 12 October 2004 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The former head of MI5 Stella Rimington had her diplomacy tested at her event yesterday, not by her interviewer, Woman's Hour's Jenni Murray, but by fierce interrogators in her audience.

The former head of MI5 Stella Rimington had her diplomacy tested at her event yesterday, not by her interviewer, Woman's Hour's Jenni Murray, but by fierce interrogators in her audience.

Rimington came totalk about her novel, At Risk, which she says is not autobiographical despite the much-remarked-on fact that the central character is a woman MI5 agent who bears a startling resemblances to its author. To be an "agent runner", as the heroine is (and Rimington was for many years) needs "sympathy, warmth and persuasion, as well as a certain ruthlessness which I also think is a feminine characteristic," she explained. She added "anyone trying to make a bomb from the recipe in At Risk would be deeply disappointed ... are better places to find a recipe for a bomb than in the pages of a novel, on the internet, actually".

But Rimington's audience was not happy to stick to fiction. "If you had been in the position of John Scarlett as head of the JIC when Alastair Campbell requested that you alter the conclusion of the final JIC dossier on weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, would you have [done so]?" asked one. There was a long pause. "I donít know, is the answer, because I wasn't in that position". But if you ask me what I think about putting a dossier into the public domain, I would say that I think it is fraught with difficulty, because intelligence is never precise," she eventually replied. "If you try to turn that into something that is capable of being put into the public domain, in order to make it comprehensible, to a very large extent those caveats have got to be removed, and I think that's what happened. So had I been around I would certainly have thought, 'No good is going to come of this, putting intelligence into the public domain,' and that is my feeling about what happened there."

In At Risk, Rimington has portrayed a young woman terrorist with some degree of sympathy, and this is a decision she had no qualms about defending. "Although I have no sympathy with what they're trying to do, I have a certain amount of sympathy with their backgrounds, which have led them to this particular point in their lives," she explained. "And each one has got something in their life that has caused them to take one route rather than another route."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in