Boyd Tonkin: Wylie's proposition looks full of holes. Does he care? I doubt it

Monday 26 July 2010 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

In Homer's epic, Odysseus is a cunning trickster who has a knack of duping monsters and outwitting giants. They huff and puff, but he always comes out ahead. In the few days since news emerged that super-agent Andrew Wylie is to bypass publishers with his own bespoke list of "Odyssey Editions" e-books, the Homeric parallel has held.

How dare "the Jackal" intrude on our patch, the corporate titans have fumed. Hugely profitable international conglomerates who plan to pay as small a royalty as possible to authors for digital editions of books to which they own the rights have shrieked in horror at the very idea that, in the age of electronic reading, writers and their estates might deserve a more generous deal. Random House has had a fit of the vapours and refused to deal with Wylie. HarperCollins has thrown up its hands in indignation. Macmillan is "appalled" that Wylie should have struck a deal with Amazon alone.

The usual suspects, with the usual bluster. But what happened yesterday? John Makinson, chief executive of Penguin – the group with most titles affected by the Wylie move – noted that a small agent-led e-book imprint was "not a cosmic issue". Then his ultimate boss Marjorie Scardino, CEO of Pearsons which owns Penguin, announced very healthy results for the group's publishing arm. What else did she say? That publishers should offer better terms to authors for e-books and that "we will see a rise in royalty rates". Jackal 1; corporate suits 0. Talk about a quick kill.

Wylie aims to provoke, and to annoy. He has done both. In truth, the Odyssey Editions proposition looks full of holes: from legal doubts about whether he really has unassigned electronic rights, to the cost of designing, promoting and selling the e-books. With no help from publishers, Wylie has to create every aspect of his electronic imprint. That will wipe out much of the cost saving that should allow authors to receive a more ample royalty deal when a digital edition simply replicates a printed one.

Does he care? I doubt it. He has scored already. The insulting offers for digital rights made to many authors by the trade-publishing giants have come into the spotlight. Wylie-Odysseus has called their bluff. He will sail away to the next venture while they nurse their injured pride.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in