All you need to know about the books you meant to read
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.EUSTACE AND HILDA (1944-49)
by LP Hartley
Plot: Eustace and Hilda are brother and sister, mucking about at the seaside. Eustace finds a shrimp half-eaten by an anemone and, terminally over-sensitive, finds himself in a quandary: the problem is solved by Hilda who decisively wrenches the shrimp from its predator; as a result, both creatures perish. This incident is the emblematic leitmotif of the novel. Eustace is taken up by a fairy godmother figure, Miss Fothergill, who leaves him pots of money when she dies. He decides to share this with his sister, so that both "shrimp" and "anemone" can survive. The only blot is Eustace's heart condition. He goes to Oxford. Slightly unhinged, Hilda opens a clinic and is betrayed by a posturing, neo-fascist friend of Eustace, has a breakdown and withers in a wheelchair. Eustace comes to the rescue: but in bringing the anemone back to life, the shrimp must die...
Theme: Eustace and Hilda are locked in a stately pavane of mutual destruction that they neither can nor wish to halt. Eustace evolves into a symbol of the refined aesthetic spirit, while Hilda is the tenacious do-gooder, a public-spirited pain in the neck.
Style: Insinuatingly graceful. Hartley shifts the narrative point of view and strands the reader in a state of wary apprehension.
Chief strengths: Apart from George Eliot's Mill on the Floss, no other novel offers such a devastating illumination of sibling rivalry.
Chief weakness: The half-eaten shrimp and the carnivorous anemone, a deeply off-putting symbol of the sexual act.
What they thought of it then: Hartley's chum, Lord David Cecil, speaks of the trilogy's "poignancy", "pathos", and "exquisite refinement for feeling"; he omits to stress the irony and humour.
What we think of it now: Apart from The Go-Between, most of Hartley's work is out of favour. He falls between the social acuity of James and the sexual poetry of Lawrence.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments