BOOKS: THE BOOK THAT CHANGED ME: JONATHAN FREEDLAND

The Rights of Man by Thomas Paine

Jonathan Freedland
Saturday 01 May 1999 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Thomas Paine's Rights of Man is one of those books people refer to, or cite as a historic event, but rarely read. I picked it up in 1996, when I was still a Washington correspondent, seeking merely to pluck out the odd quotation. But, like the man who walks in on a movie he didn't mean to see, I stayed to the end.

It turns out to be a cracking read. Plenty of Paine's contemporaries regarded him as the greatest political writer who ever lived, and a session with the Rights of Man soon shows why. By turns, it's playful and aggressive, detailed and rhetorical. Officially a response to Edmund Burke's critique of the French Revolution, it soon emerges as the model polemic: clear, accessible and breathlessly persuasive.

Take his riff on the absurdity of titles. "France has not levelled; it has exalted. It has put down the dwarf to set up the man. Through all the vocabulary of a Adam, there is not such an animal as a Duke or Count." No wonder Rights of Man won rave reviews and became an instant bestseller: costing just sixpence, it sold hundreds of thousands within weeks. For any first-time writer of polemic, that's quite an inspiration.

But what seduced me were the ideas. Two centuries ago, Paine saw the world so clearly, his analysis remains not just relevant, but almost shockingly urgent for today. He wrote as an admirer of America's sense of possibility. He contrasted that with the hereditary principle still operating in his home country. He may have been writing in 1791, but his words still rang horribly true as I read them in the Washington of the late 1990s.

Most striking, though, was the can-do optimism which runs through Rights of Man, just as keenly as it must have done through the new America which had stolen Paine's heart. His core belief was that each generation had the power to remake the world anew, not to be weighed down by the inheritance of the past. In a beautiful sentence, he declared, "Government is for the living, not the dead."

So here was a Briton, thrilled by America, full of dreams for his own country. I knew what I had to do: Paine's polemic, written in the dusk of the 18th century, inspired me to make a stab of my own - aimed at the dawn of the 21st.

Jonathan Freedland's 'Bring Home the Revolution' is published by Fourth Estate

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in