Student Work-in-Progress Show, Royal College of Art, London

 

Michael Glover
Thursday 19 January 2012 12:51 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

An interim show is a nerve-racking business. Just think about it. You have been at the college since October and now, just three months into the business of being an MA student, you are expected to put on a credible show of work. No wonder the press is not allowed in until about five minutes before the official opening.

And yet an interim show is good for both student and art lover. After all, these students are not absolute beginners. They had to be very good to get here in the first place. And now they are at the RCA to extend and refine their practice. We are seeing them at the beginning of a new leap forward - we hope. What is more, because these students are not yet media savvy, to see such a show as this one helps us to take the temperature of sculpture and painting now. Are either of these disciplines sickly? Or are they in rude health?

From the evidence of this show, painting is now in fine fettle, sculpture much less so. There is a quartet of painters here who possess both singularity of vision and remarkable depths of skill. Their names are Tobias Teschner, Neil Raitt, Benjamin Brett and Katrin Koskaru. Teschner is the strongest of them all. He paints scenes straight out of northern European painting traditions. The largest of his works here (look out for the three very small ones, too, which hang almost exactly opposite) is a finely detailed hallucinogenic landscape that harks back somewhat to Hieronymus Bosch in its mystery and its love of grotesquery. Neil Raitt is a fantastical painter too. Rave shows us a rising hillside of a human head - the way he has made it reminds us of Arcimboldo - strewn with wrecked cars. The trees are Stanley Spencerian, the entire scene bathed in a weird, spectral light.

I wouldn't bank on sculpture having much of a future from the evidence of much of this show. So many of these sculpture students seem to have no conception at all of what they think sculpture ought to be - other than an unruly agglomeration of disparate objects shown together in bizarre combinations, bizarre enough to make you laugh. Is this really all that sculpture amounts to? Could a sculpture not be made from a single material? Would that make it too serious to be laughed at?

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in