Architecture Update: Blame pollutants, not sick buildings, says professor
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.JUST as we are getting used to the term 'sick building syndrome' for an office that causes its occupants to suffer symptoms from irritability to rashes and coughs, research claims there is no such thing.
Professor Pat O'Sullivan, of the Bartlett School of Architecture, London University, is carrying out a pounds 680,000 research programme, funded partly by the Department of Trade and Industry, to establish guidelines for designing and running healthy buildings.
Only specific areas of a building are likely to make you sick, he says. The question for architects and owners is: which bits, and why? Professor O'Sullivan blames the 24,000 pollutants known to be used in the building industry, including a variety of dusts produced during construction.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments