A stage too far for young Worthingtons

David Lister
Tuesday 04 June 1996 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Noel Coward's celebrated lyric can now be amended. "Don't put your daughter on the stage, Mrs Worthington - unless you and Mr Worthington are prepared to pay for her training."

The Gulbenkian report highlights the utter illogicality of a system that gives mandatory grants for art and music education, but none for dance and drama. An aspiring actor offered a place at Rada or another drama school is likely to have to find pounds 7,000 out of his or her own pocket, or more realistically his or her parents' pockets.

Rada's working-class heroes, from Albert Finney to Jane Horrocks, are likely to become a phenomenon of the past.

This may be music to the ears of Hollywood producers who can now look forward to a stage army of Hugh Grants and Helena Bonham Carters to bolster their image of Merchant Ivory Britain. But it is a depressing scenario for aspiring stars, in both dance and drama, not possessed of rich parents. It is small wonder that some in the profession yesterday seized on the idea of lottery cash being used to pay part of the tutition and maintenance costs of dance and drama students. It is an idea that has already seized the imagination of the Secretary of State for National Heritage, Virginia Bottomley.

Here would be a chance to throw money at real people, young people, poor people, talented people.

It is a temptation hard to resist in the run-up to the election, and one she is keen to see realised despite the opposition of Lord Gowrie, chairman of the Arts Council, which distributes the lottery cash.But lottery cash is an unpredictable planning tool, and, who knows, could in future years be diverted from the arts to other areas.

Mrs Bottomley and Gillian Shephard at the Department of Education and Employment need to see dance and drama students not as "good causes" who could benefit from lottery cash but as legitimate higher-education students, meriting mandatory awards.

The alternative is a class-based profession which puts private income above talent. A recipe for true luvvies.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in