Letter: MPs should save it for the judge
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.SO IT is now an accepted part of an MP's job to make representations to the Attorney General about prosecutions of his constituents ('Sleaze, smears, Saudis, leaks and dodgy money' 27 June), and about 200-300 such approaches are made yearly, without apparent protest by the Attorney General.
There was a time when decisions on who was to be tried for serious offences were taken on the evidence in open court. No politician would have dreamt of interfering.
This seems so long ago now, but it was only in 1985 that control of criminal prosecutions was handed over to the Civil Service. The consequent inefficiency and public discontent were correctly predicted. But I, for one, was not prepared for the law's subsequent decline into Westminster sleaze and special pleading.
I suppose a return to independent prosecutors is beyond hope. Once Whitehall gets its hands on power it never lets go.
Robert Morfee
Yeovil, Somerset
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments