Letter: Implications of a rape verdict
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Having served on the jury of a rape case, I find it difficult to understand how someone can be found guilty and sentenced to eight years in a trial that lasted just a few days ('Taxi driver jailed for rape in cab', 23 July). There were no witnesses, the victim was not beaten or threatened with a weapon, the defendant did not deny having sex with the victim and he gave himself up three times.
There are calls to outlaw uncorroborated confessions; witness identification, and even forensic evidence, has proved to be unreliable. Yet a man can be found guilty and sent to prison on the word of one other person.
The implications are frightening. After having sex, could it not be possible for a woman to go to a police station and say she has been raped? She does not need to be beaten, she does not need witnesses - just her word. I also wonder how many women who have been raped will be frightened to report it to the police because of the prospect of such a sentence for the accused.
I well remember a fellow juror becoming hysterical and crying after she heard the judge announce that the person she had just helped to find guilty of rape was sentenced to seven years. We were all shocked, because in that case the defendant had not beaten the victim or threatened her with a weapon and had not denied having sex. Could it even be possible that future juries will be inhibited? I can think of no other crime where someone could be convicted on the word of one person.
As for the implications for the licensed taxi industry, these are not as worrying as they are for society as a whole. The public are not stupid enough to condemn thousands of men and women on the action of one man who has turned his back on common sense and common decency.
Yours,
ANTHONY BROOKMAN
Chief Executive
Society of Professional Licensed Taxi Drivers
London, N4
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments