Prison is bad enough without being forced to give up smoking

Amid serious issues, should cigarettes really top the agenda?

Editorial
Friday 20 September 2013 14:42 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

No one doubts that cigarettes are bad for the health. Smoking also stinks – or at least it does to those who do not do it. But still the move to turn Britain’s prisons into smoke-free zones is hard to take seriously.

Most obviously, there is the question of priorities. Amid such serious issues as stubbornly high recidivism rates, say, or creakingly ancient jails, should cigarettes really top the agenda?

The Prison Officers Association, which has campaigned on the subject for some years, says that the current free-for-all risks law suits from passive smokers. Perhaps. But an outright ban, as is now proposed by the Prison Service, not only takes the restrictions of jail a step too far, it is also simply unnecessary. What is wrong with designated areas? Or lighting up outside only?

Finally, there are the simple practicalities to consider. Four of every five prisoners smoke and some incendiary commentators are already predicting riots if the ban goes ahead. At best, it creates yet more opportunities for friction.

As much as smoking stinks, then, this plan stinks more.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in