Editorial: Not only about the Queen’s age?
In her absence, Her Majesty might be taking a subtle stand against the Colombo government
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.It is, of course, entirely reasonable that our 87-year-old head of state should conserve her dwindling energies by handing some of the more long-haul responsibilities of monarchy to her son and heir. What is interesting, however, is her choice of timing.
Is it a coincidence that the new regime will begin with Prince Charles taking the Queen’s place at the Commonwealth heads of government meeting due to take place in Sri Lanka in November? Or could it be that the woeful human rights record of the Colombo government – which all too often bullies, imprisons and assaults its critics – weighed on Her Majesty’s mind?
It certainly did on those of the Canadian delegation, which is threatening to boycott the event as a result. We can only hope that the Queen was, in a suitably subtle way, making a similar point.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments