Libya cargo held under UN ban: Fear of chemical-weapons production
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A SHIPMENT of material from Malaysia that could have helped Libya develop chemical weapons has been seized under the United Nations weapons embargo. The material was seized in Singapore in March, but has only recently come to light.
The arms embargo and other sanctions were imposed on Libya on 15 April 1992 to force the handover of two intelligence agents accused of blowing up Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie in December 1988. The bombing killed 270 people.
The equipment seized consisted of eight steel chemical-reactor vessels. It was being shipped to a Libyan factory in Benghazi which makes liquids for oil exploration.
British diplomats have told the UN Security Council's sanctions committee that the equipment could have been used to produce hundreds of tons of mustard gas and nerve gases. The committee meets every 120 days to review the embargo.
The Libyan leader, Colonel Muammar Gaddafi, had denied Libya was developing chemical weapons. However, the West believes Libya began making poison gas at a plant in Rabta, south-west of Tripoli.
The Libyans said the parts ordered from Malaysia were to produce lubricating mud for drilling bits. But in March a British diplomat told the sanctions committee that they were too highly engineered for that and could be used in making chemicals for poison gas.
Last year the German government confirmed it had been told Libya was building a second poison gas plant at Trahona, said to be a copy of the Geman-designed plant at Rabta.
British concern dates to the end of 1989, when a British company was asked to provide the eight vessels for chemicals. The deal was blocked, and the Libyans turned to a Malaysian company, which sub-contracted the work to a local subsidiary of the British company.
The Malaysian authorities were asked to prevent the contract being completed, but refused, arguing that the equipment was for civilian use.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments