Clinton scraps Iranian oil deal
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.President Bill Clinton yesterday blocked a controversial deal for a United States company to develop two offshore Iranian oilfields, issuing an executive order barring aid for the oil industry of a country that Washington accuses of fostering terrorism and seeking to develop nuclear arms.
The agreement, worth up to $1bn (£0.6bn) and involving Dutch subsidiaries of the Conoco company, would have been the first big contract of its kind since the Tehran hostage crisis of 1979. But opposition has mounted steadily since word first emerged last week, first from the State Department, and then from important board members at Du Pont, Conoco's parent company.
President Clinton's decision to intervene, made public in a White House statement yesterday, appears to have been taken under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, which gives the President sweeping powers to curb the activities of US companies on grounds of national security.
His order is intended to send a "clear and unequivocal message" to Iran that normal relations with the US are impossible until Tehran changes its "unacceptable behaviour".
That behaviour, the statement makes clear, encompasses support for terrorism, at- tempts to undermine the Middle East peace process and the pursuit of weapons of mass destruction.
It warned, furthermore, that Washington was examining other economic measures that may be taken against Iran, either alone or in conjunction with its allies. A crucial role seems to have been played by Jewish organisations in the United States, which vigorously oppose any restoration of normal ties with Tehran.
With a 25 per cent stake in Du Pont, the Seagram's company has three seats of the 16 on the Du Pont board, occupied by three members of the Bronfman family, Seagram's chief executive officers.
Edgar Bronfman, Charles Bronfman and Edgar Bronf- man Jr are prominent in the World Jewish Congress and other Jewish groups.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments