Royal Commission on Criminal Justice: Gaps in the defence
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.TREVOR Henry is serving a 10-year sentence for conspiracy to commit grievous bodily harm on a former girlfriend, who was seriously injured when two unidentified men threw acid in her face, writes Heather Mills.
Henry, 36, maintained his innocence; there was no evidence against him and police could only suggest in court that he had the motive and means to launch the attack.
Lawyers say the case was so thin that the judge at his 1992 trial should never have allowed it to go before the jury. But his defence team at the time did not apply to have the case withdrawn, nor effectively challenge prosecution claims of motive and means.
The jury was not told of his previous good character. Neither was it told that following a previous attack on the victim, she had called Henry and it was he who took her to hospital and he who persuaded her to report the incident to police.
The solicitors' firm then handling the case, Toppin and Co of New Cross, south-east London, allocated a legal executive, not a solicitor, to it. The firm was criticised two weeks ago by the Court of Appeal for its part in the wrongful conviction of another of its clients, Ivan Fergus, and has since been suspended by the Law Society over a third issue.
(Photograph omitted)
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments