Mackay wins unlikely ally in divorce fight
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.PATRICIA WYNN DAVIES
Political Correspondent
Efforts by the Lord Chancellor, Lord Mackay of Clashfern, to reform divorce law received high praise from an unexpected quarter yesterday as a Conservative group enthusiastically welcomed a government Family Law Bill amendment to buttress the interests of children.
Julian Brazier, Tory MP for Canterbury and president of the Conservative Family Campaign, declared that the controversial Bill was worth passing for "this single item alone".
The amendment, due to be approved next week, will allow judges to withhold or delay a divorce where it would cause substantial financial or other hardship to a spouse or any children and it would be wrong in all the circumstances including the conduct of the parties and the interests of any children.
Mr Brazier said: "This is the most important shift towards the interests of the child for a generation."
It is expected that the views of children would normally be recorded in welfare reports rather than through evidence to the court.
The MP said the change would mean that for the first time courts would be able to look at factors such as the person with whom a parent was proposing to live.
Lord Mackay made clear yesterday, however, that the provision would only be invoked in very exceptional cases.
On the first day of the Bill's report stage yesterday, peers approved a government amendment imposing a duty on courts to ensure warring couples make every effort to save their marriages.
As rebel Tories prepared for a fresh onslaught on the Bill's main provisions for no-fault divorce after one year, the Government took the highly unusual and probably unprecedented step of appointing a Lord Chancellor's parliamentary private secretary, Peter Luff, the MP for Worcester.
Mr Luff will work closely with Jonathan Evans, a junior minister, in keeping the lid on rebellions when the controversial Bill reaches the Commons at the end of next month.
Baroness Young, the former Tory minister leading the rebellion, is pressing for fault-based divorces to be retained and for the 12-month period of "reflection and consideration" to be lengthened to 18 where the couple has children.
The Government meanwhile confirmed its intention to issue a Green Paper on "pension splitting" after divorce.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments