Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Anger at 'Labour bias' in health funds

Colin Brown,Deputy Political Editor
Tuesday 21 November 2006 20:07 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Patricia Hewitt, the Health Secretary, was accused of "breathtaking arrogance" after saying patients in Tory constituencies needed less NHS funding because they had the "good fortune" to be healthier than many patients in Labour seats.

The Health Secretary caused a furious row at a heated meeting of a Commons select committee when she was challenged by Tory MPs over the "unfair" funding system which they claimed had left hospitals in Conservative seats facing bigger deficits than in Labour constituencies.

In angry exchanges with Tory MP Mike Penning, she was asked to justify the £1,300 per head allocated to her Leicester East constituency, against the £960 per head in Mr Penning's Hertfordshire constituency. He said if his constituency received an extra £100 per head, two trusts being forced to consider a merger to cut costs would be taken out of the deficit.

That prompted Ms Hewitt to retort: "Your constituents have the good fortune to be significantly healthier than my constituents."

Mr Penning accused Ms Hewitt of "breathtaking arrogance" and described her remarks as "the most complacent and patronising evidence I have ever heard", adding: "She gets nearly £400 per head more than I do for the NHS because my constituencies aren't as sick - it's the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard."

Another Tory MP, David Amess, questioned whether it was coincidence that those with less funding tended to be in Tory areas.

Ms Hewitt said there was "no correlation" in terms of how the NHS was run.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in