Body overseeing press regulation could take a year to set up
Labour MP brands delay 'pathetic'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The body responsible for overseeing a new press regulator could take up to a year to set up, Maria Miller, the Culture Secretary, told MPs.
Ms Miller said the Royal Charter signed on Wednesday, agreed on a cross-party basis but opposed by the majority of newspaper groups, was the best way forward for press regulation.
The Charter, officially approved by the Privy Council, establishes a recognition body that is intended to oversee a powerful new press regulator with the power to levy fines of up to £1 million.
Labour MP Chris Bryant, who was awarded damages after his phone was hacked by the News of the World, had asked Ms Miller when “the body will be set up that will regulate the body that is going to be doing the regulating”.
Ms Miller responded that the panel would be set up “in the next six to 12 months”. Mr Bryant took to Twitter to criticise the length of time it could take to establish the body. He wrote: “12 months! Maria Miller says the recognising body for press self regulation will take up to 12 months to be set up. Far too long! Pathetic.”
Ms Miller said of the Royal Charter: “I believe we've got here a way forward, which will both safeguard the freedom of the press and also make sure we've got a good system of redress in place for those where errors and mistakes are made.”
Newspaper groups representing The Times, Daily Telegraph and Daily Mail opposed the Charter, citing concerns that it would lead to political interference in the freedom of the press. They are considering a further legal appeal.
But Nick Clegg, the Deputy Prime Minister, dismissed claims of an end to press freedom as “wild hyperbole” and said no media outlet would be forced to enter into the new system of press regulation.
Mr Clegg told LBC: “It is entirely voluntary. If the press don't want to enter into this new system they don't have to. Some significant parts of it have said they have got no intention of doing so.“
”The whole point of Leveson is that he does not want, I do not want, direct regulation of the press. No one wants politicians to interfere with our wonderfully vibrant and raucous press.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments