Diseases laboratory prosecuted
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.(First Edition)
THE PUBLIC body responsible for controlling the spread of infectious diseases in Britain is being prosecuted after an outbreak of typhoid in one of its laboratories, writes Tim Kelsey.
The Health and Safety Executive confirmed yesterday it is pressing criminal charges against the Public Health Laboratory Service Board under the Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 1988.
The PHLS is charged with failing to make a suitable assessment of risks to health from work with the typhoid bacteria. A laboratory worker was infected with the bacteria, which causes severe fever and can be fatal.
A spokesman for the executive refused to say whether a precedent existed for the case.
The PHLS is also charged with failing to ensure the health and safety of employees by not immunising them against Salmonella typhi, the bacteria responsible for typhoid. It is also alleged that the PHLS did not give employees adequate information or training on use of the bacteria. The trial should start on Friday at Manchester magistrates' court. At that level the fine if convicted would be not more than 25,000 pounds.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments