Detention loophole set to be closed
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A LOOPHOLE in the law which would have freed a man who killed his wife if he had remained on the run for 28 days is to be plugged by the Department of Health.
Ministers and officials have outlined plans to change the law following a public outcry over the case of James Rudman, who walked out of a secure mental unit and remained free for 27 days and 23 hours. If police had not tracked him to a house in Ireland with just one hour to spare, he would be free today and could not be rearrested.
John Bowis, Under-Secretary of State for Health, has circulated proposals for consultation aimed at tightening up Section 18 (4) of the Mental Health Act. He said: 'This provision, which allows a patient who is lawfully detained under the Mental Health Act to overturn its authority simply by walking out of the hospital and staying out for 28 days, has little to commend it.'
Concern was first raised when Rudman, 40, absconded from Towers hospital, Leicester, in a period of unescorted recreation. The family of his former wife, Susan, whom he stabbed to death in November 1991, were horrified when the Department of Health said it would be powerless to detain him after 28 days.
During his trial, at which he pleaded guilty to manslaughter on the grounds of diminished responsibility, Mr Justice McCulloch imposed a hospital order, which puts an emphasis on treatment, rather than a restriction order, which concentrates on detention. The judge had little option given that psychiatrists had testified that Rudman was mentally ill, so not a suitable candidate for prison, but not a danger to the public, so not a suitable candidate for a restriction order.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments