Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

pounds 500,000 theft case collapses

Monday 20 November 1995 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Two grandmothers charged with embezzling more than pounds 500,000 from a firm of solicitors walked free from court yesterday after the Crown's case against them dramatically collapsed.

Eleanor Masson, 62, and Doreen Cruickshank, 55, denied stealing pounds 572,778 from the Aberdeen lawyers Storie, Cruden and Simpson.

The Crown had claimed the cash was embezzled between January 1982 and February 1991, while the women worked as legal cashiers with the firm.

But after only two witnesses had given evidence in the Aberdeen Sheriff Court trial - which began on 9 November and was initially expected to last several months - both accused were acquitted by Sheriff Kenneth Forbes, to gasps from the public benches.

The defence counsel in the case, Herbert Kerrigan QC and Edward Targowski QC, criticised the Crown for its "incompetence" during four years of compiling evidence.

The women were freed after the Crown was unable to continue its case because of difficulties in presenting evidence of bank statements under the Prisoners and Criminal Proceedings (Scotland) Act of 1993.

Sheriff Forbes rejected a Crown motion asking for the case to be deserted temporarily and for an extension until next April to allow the prosecution to change its method of presenting evidence.

Masson, of Burnieboozle Crescent, Aberdeen, and Cruickshank, of Gordon Court, Newmachar, near Aberdeen, showed no reaction as they left the dock, neither acknowledging the other. Lawyers for the Crown would not say if they would appeal, but added: "We are reviewing our position."

Melville Watson, a senior partner with Storie, Cruden and Simpson, later criticised the way the case collapsed. It is understood that the firm is pursuing a separate civil case against both women in the Court of Session in Edinburgh.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in