Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Politicians top of bad breath league

Cathy Comerford
Friday 19 February 1999 20:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

POLITICIANS AND lawyers may be blessed with the gift of the gab but many have bad breath.

Professor Mel Rosenberg, a microbiologist, told a British Dental Association conference yesterday that politicians, lawyers, judges, MPs and teachers were more likely to have "dragon-mouth" because they were forever talking.

"Their mouths dry out as they talk and when your mouth dries out, the saliva, the body's mouthwash, cannot carry away the bacteria. Also the movement of the tongue airs the smelly gases and sends them out."

More than 100 dentists attended a seminar given by the Israeli scientist in Stratford-upon-Avon, Warwickshire.

Professor Rosenberg has studied bad breath for more than 15 years. He believes that Stratford resident William Shakespeare, who wrote a lot about good and bad breath, may have suffered from it. He said: "Although the causes of the condition are still uncertain today, primitive health care during the 16th century would mean many may well have suffered the condition."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in