Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Police called in over council 'fraud' report

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

UNLAWFUL practice and possible fraud, spreading over a decade and involving millions of pounds, have been discovered at Lambeth Borough Council by its officers.

A confidential report reveals a catalogue of abuse involving civil engineering, highways, housing repairs and maintenance. Sources close to the south London council said last night that the police would be asked to investigate some of the practices uncovered.

According to the report by the chief executive, Herman Ouseley, which councillors will see this week, substantial amounts of highways work was carried out without committee authority, making the expenditure unlawful; there were significant breaches of planning legislation when up to pounds 10m was spent on roads; there were failures by some departments to comply with undertakings given to the district auditor.

The report cites 214 staff made redundant in 1991 and being given premature retirement at a cost to the council of pounds 1.8m 'without any authority at all'. Retrospective approval could not be given to much of this expenditure and 'major issues of negligence and/or wilful misconduct for individual officers arise'.

Several millions of pounds of work had been placed with sub- contractors, again without any authority. Some had not gone to the cheapest contractor and some jobs had been charged when they had not been done.

In the integrated building service there was a lack of procedures for letting and managing contracts 'and thus the opportunities for fraud are legion'.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in