Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Obituary: Sir Michael Eastham

Julia M. Stanczyk
Sunday 21 March 1993 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

IN THE ADDRESS he gave at Michael Eastham's memorial service on 10 March, Sir Stephen Brown, President of the Family Division of the High Court of Justice, said, 'This Division requires special qualities.' That Eastham had those 'special qualities' is unquestionable but what I would particularly like to underline about him were his compassion and devotion to his office, writes Julia M. Stanczyk (further to the obituary by Jeremy Gompertz, 13 March).

Eastham was admitted to hospital on Friday 26 February and, against medical advice, discharged himself the following Monday for the sole purpose of hearing a long-running and most unhappy child dispute which he had heard on a number of occasions previously. He fell outside court and sustained a ghastly eye injury which must have caused him enormous discomfort. That and his serious illness notwithstanding, he gathered all of his strength to deal with the dispute in his normal, attentive and thorough way for the sake of the child involved. He was able to make orders for the benefit of the child before being called back to hospital where he died two days later.

At a time when the judiciary seems constantly to be the focus of criticism, Eastham's dedication and courage, which gained him the lifelong admiration and thanks of the father in that dispute, should not go unremarked.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in