Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Equality policy lives on

Mary Dejevsky
Tuesday 02 December 1997 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A recent out of court settlement in a landmark race relations case showed how far public and legal opinion has now swung against 30 years of affirmative action.

This policy, which encouraged positive discrimination for jobs and university places in favour of ethnic minorities and women has been in retreat for more than a year.

The celebrated case of a white teacher, Sharon Taxman, who sued for wrongful dismissal after her school chose to keep a black teacher on the staff, had been expected to decide the legality of "affirmative action" once and for all.

But last month Ms Taxman agreed to settle for more than $400,000 rather than go to the Supreme Court. The money was paid not by the school authorities (the defendants), but by the Black Leadership Forum, a group of civil rights organisations. Their only possible motive was to fend off a judgment that they anticipated would go against affirmative action. The settlement means that there will be no Supreme Court ruling, therefore no end to affirmative action.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in