Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Countryside `is starting to look like theme park'

Stephen Goodwin Heritage Correspondent
Sunday 08 December 1996 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A proliferation of show-farms, garden centres and heritage sites is threatening to turn the countryside into a "Merrie England theme park", according to the Council for the Protection of Rural England.

In a report, The Cluttered Countryside, to be published today, the conservation charity warns of the cumulative and suburbanising effect of changes, from white-on-brown tourist signs to golf courses.

"Tourism is a rough and demanding lover," observes the council. But equally damaging to the landscape is the rash of telecommunication masts put up by mobile phone companies, and the garish fascias of petrol stations.

Only last week, John Gummer, the Secretary of State for the Environment, spoke out against a neat, "homogeneous world" in which diversity was ironed out by commerce. Some of Mr Gummer's dislikes, such as out-of-town shopping centres and anonymous housing estates on greenfield sites, are shared by the council. But the Secretary of State would balk at the charity's regulatory pre- scription.

At today's launch of the report, broadcaster Jonathan Dimbleby, the council's president, will stress the value of a countryside free of the "unnecessary paraphernalia" of modern society. "Reclaiming the countryside from the tide of clutter would be good for business as well as the environment."

The report starts from the premise that ugliness, like beauty, comes in small packages. While there may be a big fuss over a new dual carriageway, the slow accretion of changes such as an advertising hoarding, a glass phone box or a signpost throttles the countryside by stealth.

Though the council insists that protecting the countryside is not reactionary, its recommendations would require a hefty tranche of legislation. High priority is given to curbing "brown signs" disease.

Originally the signs were restricted to tourist attractions with more than 20,000 visitors a year. Now they are available to almost anyone willing to meet the cost. To Mr Gummer's department, however, it is a case of "balancing safeguards for the countryside against economic needs".

The council wants the signs made subject to the same controls as advertising and a limit set on the number of businesses qualifying. It also recommends tightening planning controls on caravan sites, "land-hungry" leisure developments such as golf courses, farm buildings and telecommunications masts.

Masts are regarded by conservationists as the most serious current threat to the skyline. Those less than 15 metres high are effectively free of planning controls - approval can be refused within 28 days if there is a "serious threat to amenity" - and councils have been instructed to "respond positively" to applications to erect taller ones.

New masts should be a last resort and mobile phone companies should share, rather than duplicate, equipment says the council. If England is to retain a landscape worthy of the name, it cannot afford "an uncontrolled weedgrowth of ironmongery" on the hills.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in