PIA headed for row with IFAs
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The City's top pension regulator yesterday set in motion a row with independent financial advisers by agreeing to tough compensation guidelines for up to 1.5 million victims of the pension transfer scandal.
The board of the Personal Investment Authority (PIA) decided yesterday to press ahead with guidelines forcing independent financial advisers (IFAs) to contact their clients and ask them if they believe they have been badly advised.
The PIA's decision, to be announced next week, looks set to start a bitter legal battle with the IFA Association, the advisers' trade body. The IFAA has won a restraining order against another watchdog, the Insurance Brokers Regulatory Council, preventing it from implementing very similar guidelines.
However, lawyers for the PIA yesterday said that counsel's opinion, taken last week, suggested the regulator could defend its stance.
This was because, unlike the IBRC, the PIA had consulted its members on its proposals. The PIA's plans follow a report by the City's senior regulator, the Securities and Investments Board, in November.
This found that at least 350,000 people might be in need of urgent compensation totalling up to £3bn for being wrongly advised to transfer out of their work pension schemes.
Advisers carried out a third of all transfers. However, they are opposed to the PIA's proposals, believing that they violate the Financial Services Act.
IFAs argue that if they contact clients any claims against them will not be met by their professional indemnity insurers, in effect bankrupting them.
The PIA yesterday agreed that if indemnity was a problem then clients could be contacted by its own pensions unit instead.
But IFAs will be charged for the work carried out by the pensions unit. No price has yet been set for this. It is believed the board rejected a call, backed by Colette Bowe, its chief executive, for more work on a less urgent area of transfer cases before agreeing to guidelines.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments