Customers demand refunds for PPIs
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Customers seeking refunds flooded a banking watchdog with complaints yesterday after serious failings were exposed in the £5bn-a-year industry in Payment Protection Insurance (PPI).
By mid-afternoon, about 400 PPI holders had contacted the Financial Ombudsman Service, more than double the daily average.
Personal finance experts say PPI is frequently unnecessary, limited and expensive. On Wednesday the Financial Services Authority fined a subsidiary of HSBC, HFC Bank, a record £1m for failing to monitor staff who sold the insurance to 163,000 sub-prime customers.
Following publicity, the number of inquiries to the ombudsman rose, rising still higher on the publication of our front page report yesterday.
Record numbers of customers are winning refunds of up to £10,000 each for PPI, having been mis-sold policies for mortgages, loans and credit cards.
The Financial Ombudsman Service has so far resolved 80 per cent of complaints in favour of customers. Many PPI customers were not asked their circumstances or made aware that they were taking out the policies, or had a medical condition that would have prevented a payout.
The FSA has fined 12 firms, including GE Capital and Capital One.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments