GPs' leaders warn against 'privatisation by stealth'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Radical government plans to rid the NHS of "problem" GPs could pave the way for a wholesale privatisation, senior doctors warned yesterday.
Health Department proposals to force "underperforming" GPs into short-term contracts were criticised last night by angry doctors' leaders. They fear it will make it easier for local primary care trusts (PCTs) to sack doctors and bring in private companies to run surgeries. They claim uncertainty caused by such a proposal might deter doctors from investing in patient services and could damage GPs' relationships with patients.
"The British Medical Association [BMA] is worried this is a step closer to privatising the health service," said Dr Laurence Buckman, chair of the BMA's general practitioners' committee. "The relationship between doctor and patient could evaporate as a result," he added.
Most surgeries currently have a "contract for life" which, critics argue, makes it almost impossible to deal with repeated poor performers as trusts can use a "carrot" but have no "stick".
Dr Buckman said: "It is an outrageous slur on most GPs to suggest a link between poor practice and breaking up the whole system of GP services. There are plenty of ways to deal with the minority of underperforming practices that don't include breaking up the continuity of care or flogging off GP practices to the private sector."
According to the Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP), short-term contracts are a "red herring" as PCTs' existing powers are sufficient to tackle GP underperformance, if used effectively. They would prefer the introduction of minimum standards, if the standards are set by doctors but enforced by the trusts.
Professor Steve Field, chairman of the RCGP, said: "We do believe there is a need to ensure high-quality care is delivered to our patients. However, PCTs should not shrink away from their responsibility of helping practices to improve and, where necessary, ensuring the small percentage of underperforming practices do not continue."
The Department of Health refused to confirm it had plans to change the current system.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments