Michael Jackson estate wins appeal in HBO Leaving Neverland lawsuit
The late performer’s estate originally sued the network for $100 million, arguing it violated a nearly three-decade-old non-disparagement clause
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Michael Jackson estate has won an appeal against HBO for the network's 2019 documentary Leaving Neverland, which accused the late singer of sexually abusing two young boys.
Suing for $100 million (£75.4m), the Jackson estate argued that Leaving Neverland violated a nearly three-decade-old non-disparagement clause from a 1992 concert film from the "Dangerous" tour, which HBO produced.
As reported by Variety, HBO countered that the clause should be considered irrelevant and accused the Jackson estate of silencing victims of sexual abuse.
In 2019, a lower court let the late pop singer’s estate take their dispute to arbitration, which HBO appealed. On Monday (14 December), a three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the initial ruling.
Read More: Barry Gibb says ‘trapped’ Michael Jackson ‘didn’t know who his friends were’
"The contract contained a broad arbitration clause that covers claims that HBO disparaged Jackson in violation of ongoing confidentiality obligations," the panel ruled. "We may only identify whether the parties agreed to arbitrate such claims; it is for the arbitrator to decide whether those claims are meritorious."
An attorney for HBO, Theodore Boutrous, argued that the 1992 contract had effectively expired once each side had fulfilled its obligations, an argument the three-judge court rejected.
"An arbitration clause can still bind the parties, even if the parties fully performed the contract years ago," they said.
HBO may now make their argument before an arbitrator or appeal the panel's ruling to the full 9th Circuit.
"The trial judge and now the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals have unanimously rejected HBO’s arguments," the Jackson estate's attorneys, Howard Weitzman and Jonathan Steinsapir, said. "In the court’s own words, HBO ‘agreed that it would not make any disparaging remarks concerning Jackson.’ It’s time for HBO to answer for its violation of its obligations to Michael Jackson."
Read More: Leaving Neverland: HBO urges appeals court to throw out lawsuit over Michael Jackson documentary
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments