Letter: Benefit of change
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: We read with interest Andrew Grice's report on the Joint Employment and Social Security Select Committee report on the new ONE Service ("MPs warn of `mistrust and alarm' over benefit interviews", 28 July). We are grateful to the committee for their helpful report which is generally very positive about the ONE Service. We will take their recommendations very seriously.
On the points to which Mr Grice draws attention, we fully intend that the invitation to attend ONE interviews, especially as they become compulsory, should be positive and helpful as the committee recommends, and we shall do everything possible to establish personal contact before stopping benefit. Further, the choice of areas was driven by the need to test the feasibility and effect of the ONE Service on a variety of labour markets, so needed to include affluent and mixed as well as deprived areas.
ANDREW SMITH
ANGELA EAGLE
Department for Education and Employment
London SW1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments