Culture: There’s nothing like the real thing

Toby Young
Saturday 21 February 2009 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Why are feature-length documentaries typically more enjoyable than feature films? Man on Wire won a Bafta for Outstanding British Film, but it should have been nominated for Best Film. Tonight, we’ll discover whether it wins an Oscar for Best Documentary Feature – I think it will – but, again, it should be up for Best Picture.

The short answer to this question is that audiences are less and less willing to suspend disbelief. Documentary features pack more of a punch because the events they depict are real. It’s the same reason many people prefer “reality” television to TV drama, “documentary” plays to made-up ones and non-fiction books to novels. Of the five films that have been nominated for a Best Picture Oscar, two are docudramas (Milk and Frost/Nixon). Verisimilitude is king.

However, this answer is plainly wrong. The best documentary features – like the best reality-TV shows, documentary plays and non-fiction books – don’t let the facts get in the way of a good story. Their creators don’t invent things out of whole cloth; rather, they manipulate the viewer just as surely as conventional film-makers do.

Good documentaries have a clear, narrative spine – usually involving one or more protagonists facing up to a challenge – and their makers include those facts that propel this narrative forward and leave out those that don’t.

In other words, the reason that documentary features are often so much better than conventional features is that their makers employ classic storytelling techniques that their Hollywood counterparts have more or less abandoned. Paradoxically, the art of storytelling survives, but in films,TV shows and books that purport to be true rather than made up.

A case in point is Anvil: The Story of Anvil, a documentary released last Friday about a heavy-metal band. It charts the efforts of a group of Canadian musicians who have been struggling to make it since 1973. You start out laughing at them as the real-life embodiment of Spinal Tap, but by the end they’ve completely won you over and you’re willing them to succeed. The film’s real subject is the heavy price you pay for refusing to abandon your dreams and I doubt a more involving story will come along this year.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in